You and Your Money – August 2009

In the last of our four-part series, Johnny McNamara looks at the danger of counter party risk and shows you how to minimise the external threat to your own personal economy.

In previous articles I have developed the concept of managing and controlling your own personal economy. The key to achieving this is to identify the areas of your finances that are in your control and to recognise the areas that are outside of your control. Where you identify an area that you have no control over, this becomes a risk to your personal economy and so, it is vital to minimise these risks every way you can.

One of the biggest risks to our wealth today is known as “counter party risk.” This can be defined as the risk to each party of a contract that the other party will not live up to its contractual obligations. In most financial contracts, counter party risk is also known as “default risk.”

Counter party risk is apparent in almost all aspects of our financial lives from our savings and investments right through to our pension arrangements. The effects of counter party default have been particularly evident in the current economic climate, which has seen the collapse of many large financial institutions both here and across the world. This has led to the images we have all seen of people queuing outside banks for fear of losing their money.

So how do you remove counter party risk from your personal economy? Unless you are going to store all your wealth in gold bullion and carry it around with you, it is impossible to remove all elements of counter party risk. However, the key to gaining more control is to remove as much counter party risk as possible.

In my last article I developed the concept of taking ownership of your pension funds. Taking ownership of all of your assets – whether they be in pension or any other form – is the first step in helping to eliminate counter party risk. Once you have been able to establish ownership, the next question must be: what asset classes should you look to invest in to further remove the threat of counter party risk?

A good starting point is to look at the concept of ownership versus loanership assets within your personal economy. To understand this concept fully, we must identify the difference between ownership assets and loanership assets or in other words, real assets versus financial assets.

A real asset is a tangible or physical asset that will only ever appear on one side of the balance sheet, i.e. the asset on one side does not create a liability on another balance sheet. Therefore a real asset does not carry any form of counter party risk as it is direct ownership. Gold is a prime example of a real asset that is tangible and has a value in its own right due to its scarcity and people’s desire to own it.

A financial asset is an asset that is essentially a contract between two or more parties that merely represents an asset. The financial asset itself has no intrinsic value because it is not a tangible or physical asset, but merely a representation of one. A financial asset therefore sits on both sides of a balance sheet. For one party entering in the contract there will be an asset (bonds, share certificates etc.) and on the other hand, the other party will have a liability (repayment of bond, value of share etc.)

This is where counter party risk is generated, as the asset owned is only as good as the other party’s ability or willingness to honour their side of the contract.

When you bring in other financial assets that include debt derivatives, you often find that this increases the amount of counter parties involved and so, increases further the risk of default somewhere along the chain. A great example of this can be seen from what happened with the sub-prime mortgage market, where the debt was repackaged further and further away from the real asset until eventually the chain collapsed. If you are at the end of the chain, you are the one who suffers most financially from the counter party risk and subsequent default.

Many people have been fooled into thinking that financial assets should be considered as savings. However, as we have seen over the last few years, through counter party default these assets can become worthless very quickly. When looking at where to invest, it is important to remember that real investment brings with it real assets and real capital formation, which is the cornerstone on which future wealth is built.

With this in mind, what can you do now to take back ownership of your personal economy? It is my opinion that a significant part of your wealth should be invested in real assets through structures in your ownership and control. The amount to which you hold your wealth in real assets will come down to your faith or lack thereof in the financial system as it currently stands. Recently we have seen a massive amount of mistrust generated in our financial systems – both locally and globally – which has already seen a shift in investment towards real asset classes.

Counter party risk is evident in every part of our financial lives and represents a big risk. One of the biggest counter party risks out there is what’s happening in the global economy. We know that we cannot control factors at play in the global or local economy, but we need to understand how they affect us so we can plan for the future. However, we also know that there are factors that can be controlled through ownership. It is only through ownership that you can gain control and it is only through control that you can gain the ability to manage your personal economy.

To arrange an appointment with McNamara & Associates, call 01 230 9000.